主要官員評分總表Summary Table of Ratings of Principal Officials返回


調查日期 Date of Survey : <<24-26/6/2002, 10-15/7/2002, ..., 6-9/8/2018>>

司長評分
Ratings of Secretaries of Departments

  調查日期 Date of survey: 24-26/6/2002 »
姓名
 Name
支持度 
Support Rating  
標準誤差 
Standard Error  
認知率 
Recognition rate  
 政務司司長曾蔭權 Chief Secretary for Administration Donald Tsang Yam-kuen 67.7   0.6   90.3%   
 財政司司長梁錦松 Financial Secretary Antony Leung Kam-chung 61.2   0.6   86.8%   
 律政司司長梁愛詩 Secretary for Justice Elsie Leung Oi-sie 49.2   0.8   83.7%   
 


局長評分:認知率達到五成者
Ratings of Directors of Bureaux: Those with recognition rates reaching 50%

  調查日期 Date of survey: 24-26/6/2002 »
姓名
 Name
支持度 
Support Rating  
標準誤差 
Standard Error  
認知率 
Recognition rate  
 保安局局長葉劉淑儀 Secretary for Security Regina Ip Lau Suk-yee 65.9   0.6   84.3%   
 經濟發展及勞工局局長葉澍 Secretary for Economic Development and Labour Stephen Ip Shu-kwan 62.6   0.6   57.8%   
 教育統籌局局長李國章 Secretary for Education and Manpower Arthur Li Kwok-cheung 62.4   0.8   54.1%   
 衛生福利及食物局局長楊永強 Secretary for Health, Welfare and Food Yeoh Eng-kiong 59.9   0.7   51.7%   
 公務員事務局局長王永平 Secretary for the Civil Service Joseph Wong Wing-ping 58.5   0.7   57.5%   
 房屋及規劃地政局局長孫明揚 Secretary for Housing, Planning and Lands Michael Suen Ming-yeung 56.7   0.7   65.2%   
 工商及科技局局長唐英年 Secretary for Commerce, Industry and Technology Henry Tang Ying-yen 56.4   0.8   58.1%   


局長評分:認知率未及五成者
Ratings of Directors of Bureaux: Those with recognition rates under 50%

  調查日期 Date of survey: 24-26/6/2002 »
姓名
 Name
支持度 
Support Rating  
標準誤差 
Standard Error  
認知率 
Recognition rate  
 環境運輸及工務局局長廖秀冬 Secretary for the Environment, Transport and Works Sarah Liao Sau-tung * 59.5   * 1.0   * 29.2%  
 財經事務及庫務局局長馬時亨 Secretary for Financial Services and the Treasury Frederick Ma Si-hang * 58.2   * 0.9   * 37.0%  
 政制事務局局長林瑞麟 Secretary for Constitutional Affairs Stephen Lam Sui-lung * 53.6   * 0.8   * 49.4%  
 民政事務局局長何志平 Secretary for Home Affairs Patrick Ho Chi-ping * 50.0   * 1.0   * 36.2%  

* 認知率不足五成者評分不能作準
Ratings with less than 50% recognition rates are not taken as representative